2023-05-02 ET-W2AT Meeting
 Date
May 2, 2023 14:00-15:00 UTC
 Participants
ET-W2AT
No | Name | Role | Present (yes/no) |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Mr Jeremy TANDY | Chair | Yes |
2 | Mr Rémy GIRAUD | Member | No |
3 | Mr Pablo Jose LOYBER | Member | No |
4 | Ms FATIMA SABAI | Member | No |
5 | Mr Peng WANG | Member | Yes |
6 | Mr Tom KRALIDIS | Member | Yes |
7 | Mr TSUNODA, Kenji | Member | Yes |
8 | Dr Baudouin Raoult | Member | Yes |
9 | Mr Thorsten BÃœSSELBERG | Member | No |
10 | Ms Dana Ostrenga | Member | No |
Other experts
Weiqing Qu
Kai Thorsten Wirt
Doug Sabers (Synoptic)
Charles Christensen
Max M
WMO Secretariat
Peiliang Shi
Enrico Fucile
Hassan Haddouch
@Xiaoxia Chen
@David Berry
@Anna Milan
Maaike Limper
 Discussion topics
Item | Item | Time | Presenter | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Status update on WIS2 nodes in pilot project | Â | Hassan | Â |
2 | Transition Gateways o GTS-to-WIS2 Gateway, proposal plus discussion o WIS2-to-GTS – open discussion on options and how we progress this task |  30 min | Kai & All  | Discussion: GTS-to-WIS2 Gateway To decide: how we name the topic and who will do that?
Q1: Topic name: (Jeremy) Can we use the GTS header directly? Filename will be provided using GTS? Filename provide enough information on internal location? (Kai) WIS2 users do not need to know TTAAii header. Not sure all users want GTS traffic. Part of data migrated, as a user, you want both data in transition. (Weiqing) WIS2 users do not necessarily know the GTS headers. Why? To give a scenario: Half migrated to WIS2, Half remain on GTS via bulletin forms. For example, users want all bulletins from Europe, but part of the countries finish migration. Will the GTS headers be useful in such case? (Baudouin) data themselves? data as files. What are the differences between file not the message at different locations? Who is pushing the data to ITA? The more we carry with GTS, the more we will stay in GTS phase. (Kai) WIS2 will not have bulletins anymore. WIS2 one observation per file. We agree that a center doesn’t operate both roles (GTS or WIS2) (Enrico) Being stuck in GTS, who running as a cache, as a gateway, requirement to provide GTS as it is during transition. Without GTS headers. (Jeremy) Do we use the topic name using GTS headers? (Action) Hassan to check if the issue is created, if not, create one issue for this. Q2: Who will operate the gateway? (Jeremy) Do more global caches run the gateway? Data needs to be distributed through Global Cache. (Kai) it is likely to be connected to MTN (Weiqing) for high reliability, (Hassan) Global Cache will provide the gateway GTS-to-WIS2. Summary: Global Cache will be connected to MTN. |
3 | WIS2box
| Â 15 min | Â 3.1 Tom | Tom: updates on the status of wis2box project. (Enrico) There will be revolution for wis2box usage as more countries are using it. Max: updates on the wis2box user interface (Baudouin) Longtitude is 14 digitals? (Jeremy) WIS2 box metadata vs OSCAR (Max) at the moment, it is decoupled. (Tom) all centers manage metadata locally. (Enrico) We have training activities coming in June. We decide not to use UI because it is not ready. To download to OSCAR? To upload to OSCAR maybe useful. We have to understand who will operate wis2box and its authority which requires more interaction wis/wigos NFP. More coordination is needed at national level. ToR of NFP will be updated accordingly. (Timo) Ongoing discussion OSCAR/Surface vs wis2box metadata. OSCAR is an operational system. What codelists do you use for country? (Tom: the same as WCMP2) |
4 | Proposals for flagging WIS2 priority issues across multiple GitHub repositories in wmo-im: | 15 min | Anna | It is agreed by the team to use the project across different repositories. Jeremy will work with Secretariat to go through all the issues and label the priorities. |
5 | Priority issues* to discuss and resolve:
| 45 min | All | Not discussed. To be shared with the team members for comments. |
 Action items
 Decisions
Â